抽象性
这份注解分析这两项决策如何改变有限合伙企业和其他非合并实体多样性权限面貌它认为,尽管如此格鲁波多数人表示坚持提交先例时间的理由,这一规则要求提交时当事人完全多样性存在,多数人实际确认并澄清Caterplyl异常范围与提交规则This Note further argues that the real impetus for the majority's decision was the fear that any tinkering with the bright-line rule of Carden, which requires courts to count the citizenship of all members of a limited partnership toward the partnership's citizenship for diversity, would undermine the Court's effort to pressure Congress into abolishing or severely curtailing diversity jurisdiction.10 Part II of this Note introduces the origins of diversity jurisdiction, how citizenship is determined for purposes of diversity, the time of filing rule and its exception, and the debate over diversity jurisdiction." Part III presents the facts, procedural history, and majority and dissenting opinions in the Grupo decision.第四部分分析法院推理并主张非合并关联先例控制案件而非提交先例时间,并讨论保留卡登光线和任意规则的实际效果第五部分最后总结说,国会应立法性地改革这一不公平规则或法院应使用它的权力这样做。
推荐引用
Friedmann,Amy(2006年)“Bright线,Dim前景:Grupo数据流ATSGlobalGroupL.P.重申有限合伙企业和其他非公司实体多样性权限的亮线屏障Akron税务杂志:卷号21,第4条
网址: https://idea交换.www.jamsic.com/akrontaxjournal/vol21/ss1/4